فعلية الحق في الصحة: دراسة تحليلية و مقارنة لنموذجي المغرب وتونس

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the right to health through a comparative analytical approach between the Moroccan and Tunisian models, aiming to assess the extent to which this right has moved from its normative constitutional and legal recognition to its practical and tangible implementation. The study is based on the central assumption that the mere constitutional and international recognition of the right to health is not sufficient to ensure its effectiveness unless it is accompanied by public policies and institutional, economic, and social structures capable of translating it into concrete reality.

The study adopts a comparative method between Morocco and Tunisia, alongside a descriptive and analytical approach, and relies on the analysis of statistical indicators related to the health sector, including human resources, health infrastructure, levels of public and individual health expenditure, as well as indicators of quality, governance, and environmental conditions.

The findings reveal that the effectiveness of the right to health in both countries remains constrained by multiple structural challenges, despite relative improvements in some quantitative indicators. Structural obstacles related to weak health governance, social and territorial inequalities, and environmental deficiencies constitute major barriers to the full enjoyment of this right. The comparison also shows that differences between Morocco and Tunisia remain relative, as improvements in certain quantitative indicators do not necessarily translate into a higher level of overall effectiveness of the right to health.

The study concludes that enhancing the effectiveness of the right to health requires an integrated and comprehensive approach that links health reforms with economic, social, and environmental policies within a sustainable development framework.